It is a common misconception that the ANC’s leader in the 1994 elections, Nelson Mandela, had been jailed for his “political beliefs.” He was in fact acquitted of treason after a 4-year trial, but re-arrested a few years later, and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment for launching an armed insurrection (as founder and commander-in-chief of Mkhonto weSizwe, the ANC’s militant wing). He was then later charged with 193 counts of terrorism: for sabotage and for trying to smuggle, prepare, or manufacture (mostly Soviet-bloc) munitions, including: 210,000 hand-grenades, 48,000 anti-personnel mines, 144 tons of ammonium-nitrate, 21.6 tons of aluminum powder, 1,500 timing devices,b and 2,000 lbs. of black gunpowder. Among his many alleged co-conspirators were 3 'white' communist: Denis Goldberg, Arthur Goldreich, and Lionel “Rusty” Bernstein. Nelson Mandela’s personal Makarov pistol (“for killing white policemen”) which he buried in Rivonia before his arrest during the ANC’s “armed struggle,” was never recovered. These were clearly not “trumped-up” political charges. In his eloquent closing statement to the court, Mandela candidly admitted his guilt on the charge of sabotage, adding that he was, if needs be, prepared to die for his ideals. It was apparent from the huge amount of smuggled explosives that he was not planning to die alone.Nelson Mandela was sentenced to life imprisonment; not summarily executed, as he undoubtedly would have been, in any black African country at that time, for the same offenses. Some made fanciful comparisons with the fate of plotter Guy Fawkes, who was burned at the stake for his failed attempt to blow up the British parliament in 1605. However Mandela conspired not just to bring down the government—he was planning on killing tens of thousands of innocent civilians in his quest for power.
The judge at his trial did in fact comment that “personal ambition” may well have played a role in his plans. Mandela boldly admitted his guilt.He was never tortured during either his interrogation or incarceration (as he undoubtedly would have been in a black nation). In fact, he was generally treated humanely by his white captors; eventually being transferred from Robben Island, to the mainland, and living comfortably in a cottage in the grounds of the prison for the latter part of his incarceration.Although he was approached and offered an early release by then-president Pieter Willem (P.W.) Botha (1916-2006), in the mid 1980’s, Mandela still steadfastly refused to renounced his commitment to violence. Likewise, even when he eventually gained an early release (by F.W. De Klerk), about 6 years later, on the condition that he commit his party to peaceful negotiations, he still refused to renounce violence. As he walked free from the prison, accompanied by his second wife (& later convicted fraudster, kidnapper & alleged accessory to murder) Nomzamo “Winnie” Madikizela-Mandela (born 1936) he raised his fist in a “Black Power” salute.Further, in the first speech that he made as a “free man,” he brazenly announced that the armed struggle would continue. “The rest,” as they say, “is history.” Nelson Mandela subsequently led his communist-aligned ANC to an overwhelming victory in the first“fully democratic” South African elections in 1994. One of their favorite chants at political rallies to this day is: “Bulala AmaBuhnu” (Kill the Boers)."During South Africa’s post-Apartheid war crimes tribunal (the “Truth & Reconciliation Commission,” chaired by Archbishop Desmond Tutu) it was revealed that while the white “Apartheid regime” had murdered just over 500 of their (mainly black) political opponents—the ANC-led “liberation movement” had murdered over 22,000 of their own (mainly black) political opponents!The above is an extract from Bulala: A True Story Of South Africa by Cuan ElginIn my opinion "Bulala" is probably the most important, most authoritative and best researched book on the history of South Africa ever written. Anyone truly interested in the true history of South Africa and those invincible Boers must read this book. Bulala is the bible of South African history. - Toxinews Source:http://toxinews.blogspot.com/2013/06/was-nelson-mandela-jailed-for-his.html
Was Nelson Mandela jailed for his "political beliefs?" - An extract from Bulala Images
The Sandra Laing Story and the movie SKIN | TIA MYSOA
(250 x 344 - 89.65 KB - jpeg)
Terrorism and the Illuminati: A Three-Thousand-Year History
(250 x 250 - 19.84 KB - jpeg)
Statement Analysis will not convict anyone of anything.There will be no "Billie Dunn dropped her pronoun right here! Shawn Adkins issued an unreliable denial."Nor should a conviction rest solely upon such things.There will be, however, much evidence to present, as well as Statement Analysis, both in conclusion, and used even in trial.A Grand Jury could be asked,"Do you believe the mother's account of the sleep over that she gave the nation on the Nancy Grace Show?" along with actual analysis of her answers.Her answers show not only clear deception, mirroring the polygraph results, but also give additional information.When Billie Dunn was asked how far Hailey had to go to the sleep over, she said that she had four or five blocks to go, and then went on to attempt to portray herself as a conscientious mother, attempting to post how she put limits and boundaries on Hailey's freedoms. "She wasn't allowed to..."In referencing Hailey in the past tense, jurors may instinctively wonder, "Why would the mother of a missing child do that?", and intuitively, consider that the mother knew or believed that Hailey was dead. This would, naturally, lead to a question to investigators:"Did you tell Ms. Dunn anything that would lead her to believe that Hailey was dead?"As Dunn refused to be silent, the same inquisitive, thinking grand juror may then see the transcripts of the 6 month vigil where Dunn is heard saying something to the affect of 'see ya'll in 6 months' which may then rattle about the brain, especially if the juror is a parent, leading to more questions of the same.Of course this same juror could ask more questions along the same line, freely asking questions in the hearing of other jurors.They'll, of course, hear evidence of cell phone pings, results of lengthy interviews, behavioral analysis conclusions from the FBI, statement analysis write ups, and...whatever Hailey has to say from the grave.Do not conclude, without scientific evidentiary conclusion, that the remains were there too long to indicate anything. Don't. Next: What else a Grand Jury may hear...and ask.